Wednesday, October 03, 2007

Pope Bendict XVI's thoughts on reason.

In his Regensburg Address, the Pontiff voices an interesting opinion on the state of reason today. Essentially, he believes that modern reason and particularly the sort of reasoning as practiced in science, tends to be much too narrow in its scope. Therefore, it (reasoning) is self-limiting beyond what he (Pope Benedict XVI) thinks it should be. The Pope describes modern reason as "This modern concept of reason is based, to put it briefly, on a synthesis between Platonism (Cartesianism) and empiricism, a synthesis confirmed by the success of technology.". The Platonic/Cartesian element being the realization of how well mathematical principles can, and do, model reality. The "empiricism" is the view that only "falsification" and "experimentation" can provide you proof of what is "real".

The Pope further defines two points about what can be drawn as true from the sort of modern reason practiced today. The two points are as follows:

  1. First, only the kind of certainty resulting from the interplay of mathematical and empirical elements can be considered scientific. Anything that would claim to be science must be measured against this criterion. Hence the human sciences, such as history, psychology, sociology and philosophy, attempt to conform themselves to this canon of scientificity.
  2. A second point, which is important for our reflections, is that by its very nature this method excludes the question of God, making it appear an unscientific or pre-scientific question.
In his closing the Pontiff makes an extremely valid point, "...as I have attempted to show, modern scientific reason with its intrinsically Platonic element bears within itself a question which points beyond itself and beyond the possibilities of its methodology." I believe, in saying that the modern reasoning, because of its adopted methodology, is essentially unable to answer the question of its own existence.

Tuesday, June 26, 2007

Not So Deep Thoughts

Here are some questions for you to ponder.
  1. Reality...what is it?
  2. How do you define it?
  3. Would you think of reality as an abstract container for the events of your life?
Number three seems like a reasonable exposition to me. Perhaps you could even say that reality is the superclass from which your existence inherits. To continue with the association, let's say that our perception is the interface implemented by our existence. Sort of makes sense right? Your existence inherits properties from reality. How another existence interacts with your existence is formalized in your existence's implementation of perceptions.

Life as a software artifact!